References 61–117. RDCF https://doi.org/10.2190/06AX-QW99-EQ5GMousavinasab, E., Zarifsanaiey, N., R. Niakan Kalhori, S., Rakhshan, M., Keikha, L., & Ghazi Saeedi, M. (2021). Intelligent tutoring systems: A systematic review of characteristics, applications, and evaluation methods. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(1), 142–163. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/10494820.2018.155825 7 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. How people learn II: Learners, contexts, and cultures. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24783 National Research Council. 2000. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9853 Nentrup, E. (2022). How Policymakers Can Support Educators and Technology Vendors Towards SAFE AI. EdSAFE AI Alliance. https://www.edsafeai.org/post/how-policymakers-cansupport- aied Page, E.B. (1966). The imminence of grading essays by computer. Phi Delta Kappan, 47(5), 238– 243 Paris, D., & Alim, H.S. (Eds.). (2017). Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world. Teachers College Press. ISBN: 978-0807758342 Plass, J.L., & Pawar, S. (2020). Toward a taxonomy of adaptivity for learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(3), 275–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1719943 Regona, Massimo & Yigitcanlar, Tan & Xia, Bo & Li, R.Y.M. (2022). Opportunities and adoption challenges of AI in the construction industry: A PRISMA review. Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010045 of Psychology, Second and Complexity, 8(45). Reynolds, C.R., & Suzuki, L.A. (2012). Bias in psychological assessment: An empirical review and recommendations. Handbook Edition. Ritter, S., Anderson, J.R., Koedinger, K.R. & Corbett, A. (2007). Cognitive Tutor: Applied https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118133880.hop210004 research in mathematics education. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 249–255/ 111 | P a g e
122 Publizr Home