IN THE INDUSTRY Private Equity Continues Move into Death Care Contribution by Tom Anderson This story originally was published on October 5 on Funeral Director Daily It’s not surprising to see why in a world of 73 million baby boomers and a large group of funeral home owners planning to retire in the next five years that private equity businesses see an opportunity in Death Care, specifically in owning funeral homes. This article from Fortune entitled “Death is anything but a dying business as private equity cashes in on the $23 billion funeral home industry” has prompted a lot of discussion, and some angst, among funeral home professionals. The article points out that in the late 1980s and the early 1990s the funeral home industry went through a lot of consolidation and that is happening once again. Part of the driver of that phenomena is those baby boomer funeral directors — many who own funeral homes and are planning their retirement and exit with no upcoming generation to succeed the family tradition. Those family funeral homes have been successful over the years and many have increased in value enough that it is difficult for funeral directors entering the profession to afford the purchase price that others may be willing to pay. That’s another reason that the known consolidators and start-ups funded with private equity money are coming to the table for ownership. There is, however, among some in the profession and some in the consumer sector that believe that larger, acquisition ownership companies, driven by private equity and public ownership are not good for the future of death care. Their basic argument is that instead of consolidating assets and working to lower price via economies of scale, that these operators will reduce competition and increase the price to consumers. It’s easy to understand that the consolidators argue back that claim. Funeral Director Daily take: I think the Fortune article is really good and you should read it. As a former funeral home owner and one who sold his funeral home to a regional operation, I do think, however, that the situation of succession is much more nuanced and much more complicated than just being about selling, raising prices, and going on one’s way. Our family funeral home was founded in 1872, and is celebrating its 150th anniversary this year. I was the 4th generation in my family to assume the position of manager/funeral director/ operator of the funeral home after my father’s death. I was, and still am, very proud of our family’s heritage in helping families in my community during the loss of their loved ones and helping them move from grief to remembrance. It’s a heritage that I felt privileged to have been able to help with. That being said, the desire to retire and have less responsibilities found its way to me. There were other things in life I was interested in doing and there was no way to do them while still being employed at the funeral home full time. Our two sons, with whom we never applied any pressure to “follow the family footsteps” were about college aged and we knew that they had other life desires that didn’t include owning a funeral home. And, like others in the business, we had been successful and grew the operation which had increased its value. We talked with employees about succession but at the end of the day they were either uninterested in owning or would not be able to raise the amount of capital, even at a discounted sales price, that we thought fair. We took our funeral home to market and I wanted an owner who understood the day to day struggles of funeral directors. We found that in a CEO of a regional company that had many of the same values as I did about funeral service. That’s not to say that there are not bumps in the road moving forward — it’s very CFSA Insider | Page 12
13 Publizr Home