Page 6 By Devon Rowe, Executive Director, CARICAD T Abstract This article explores the pivotal role of Ministries of Public Administration and Public Service Commissions in guiding ethical, inclusive, and citizen-centered AI integration within the public sector. It highlights both the transformative potential and challenges of AI, including workforce displacement, data privacy, and institutional readiness. Emphasising strategic leadership, collaboration, and capacity-building, it calls for a balanced approach that safeguards human dignity while advancing innovation and efficiency in governance. echnology, and more recently Artificial Intelligence (AI), has become a force in reshaping how societies govern, serve, and connect with their citizens. While its adoption in the public sector holds transformative potential, it also brings profound challenges related to ethics, equity, institutional readiness and likely reduction in the size of the public workforce. In the evolving landscape, Ministries of Public Administration (MPAs) – also referred to in some CARICAD member states as Ministries of Public Service and Public Service Commissions (PSCs) – are not simply just administrative bodies, instead, they are even more important in their stewardship of fair, responsive, and citizen-centered governance. Historically, MPAs have championed administrative reform and public sector capacity-building, while PSCs are tasked with promoting merit-based recruitment and ensuring ethical oversight in the public service. These foundational functions remain indispensable, but the stakes have increased. The rapid acceleration of AI demands that both institutions shift gears, to become even more forward looking, embrace a more involved mandate that guides responsible digital transformation while putting considerations for the stability of the public service and motivation of public officers also at the core of future public sector transformation. When used wisely, AI has the potential to make a real difference in how public services are delivered. It can take over repetitive tasks, freeing staff to focus on more complex, people-centred work; keep certain services available around the clock; support better decision-making with solid data; and even help us anticipate social and economic needs before they become urgent. Imagine a simple chatbot helping citizens get answers about licensing or benefits without waiting in long lines, or a planning tool that helps ensure limited resources go where they are needed most, whether it is school supplies in rural areas or relief aid after a hurricane. These kinds of innovations not only improve access and transparency but also signal a paradigm shift toward agile public institutions. However, despite these benefits, the integration of AI also raises significant concerns. Job displacement in routine to senior roles calls for thoughtful workforce redeployment, re-skilling and transition programmes particularly in small island resilient states. Machine and algorithmic “blind spot” biases may threaten fairness, especially in high-stakes areas like hiring or benefits distribution. Complete dependence on automation may “dumb-down” human judgment and civic trust. Data privacy and trust become critical issues as governments collect and analyse vast amounts of personal information. The question to be asked is: “Should AI remain a tool of empowerment and productivity enhancement or a mechanism for replacement?”. • Continues on the next page
7 Publizr Home