END OF PROGRAM OUTCOME PROMPT NOTIFIABLE OUTBREAK DISEASE DETECTION & EFFECTIVE EAD RESPONSE IN PLACE What do we want to achieve? (Intermediate outcomes) How do we monitor this? (Monitoring indicators) 9.1 Percentage of Industry Members who have traceability standards included into a compliance/verification scheme/ checklist 9.2 AHA’s contribution to the strengthening of traceability meets the needs of Members 9. Improved national policy & procedures for *surveillance, traceability & welfare (refer to intermediate outcomes 10 & 11) 9.3 Percentage of Members promoting traceability on their website 15/16 Baseline 80% (12 out of a possible 15 Industry Members) 16/17 Target No target set 16/17 Actu 80% ( • ACM • ADF • AEC No baseline available Member survey: “AHA’s contribution to the strengthening of traceability” - 3.4 or above (out of 5) 55% (17 out of 31 Members) • ADF • AEC • APL • CCA • DA 9.4 Improved traceability performance against national short term traceability standards 1.1 and 1.2 for National Livestock Identification System (NLIS) cattle 9.5 Animal Welfare Standards and Guidelines (S&Gs) project milestones delivered efficiently and effectively Improvements from the 2007 traceability exercises (baseline figures) NLIS Cattle (1.1) 98% (1.2) 99.5% NLIS Sheep & goats (1.1) 62% (1.2) 46% NLIS Pig (1.1) 75% (1.2) 36% No baseline available Revised timeline adhered to Agriculture Senior Officials Committee (AgSOC) benchmark was set at 98% for short term traceability Within 90% ( previo days Within suscep exerci Over t stakeh Addit • Re No target set 55% ( Memb Above target 32 On target Not on target ANNUAL REPORT 2016-17
37 Publizr Home