Page 16 THE REVERE ADVOCATE – FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2025 BHRC | FROM Page 15 a child of a military family would retain a seat in the classroom at their current school in Massachusetts, even if their parent or guardian is temporarily transferred elsewhere on offi cial orders. If a military family moves permanently and arrives in a Massachusetts community, the bill also requires a timely and seamless transition for students who receive special education services. Other provisions allow certain information from the military to be admissible as evidence in state courts for people seeking temporary domestic violence restraining orders; allow for federal judges to transfer juvenile cases to Massachusetts courts for off enses that occur on military bases; and direct National Guard leadership to track and report suicide data among veterans of the Massachusetts National Guard. Sen. John Velis (D-Westfi eld), Senate Chair of the Committee on Veterans and Federal Aff airs, said the bill bolsters the way that Massachusetts cares for its military families and in turn helps improve our Department of Defense scorecard to maintain critical federal military investments in our state. “As we approach Veterans Day, I am incredibly proud to be a part of a legislative body that prioritizes not only our veterans and servicemembers but also our military families as well,” said Velis. “At the end of the day, my focus as Chairman of the Committee on Veterans and Federal Aff airs continues to be on ensuring that our commonwealth is not only the very best state for a veteran to call home, but also a welcoming and supportive home for our active-duty service members and their families.” “I’m proud that Massachusetts continues to seek out ways to support our active military members and veterans and their families,” said Senate President Karen Spilka (DAshland). “In advance of Veterans Day, it was important that the Senate reinforce our commitment to meeting veterans, active military members and their families where they are and provide support to those who have served and are serving our nation.” “Military families very often face diffi cult situations when parents are called to duty, never knowing when or where their service to our country will take them,” said Sen. Mike Rodrigues (D-Westport), Chair of the Senate Committee on Ways and Means. “This bill will help create a more stable environment for military serving families by ensuring continuous education and a smooth transition for special education services when changing school districts.” “I have seen firsthand the power of legislation that seeks to improve the lives of our military and military-connected families,” said Jeff rey Chin, Executive Director of Blue Star Families of New England. “[The bill] will provide our military families a vital component that has all too often been missing in their ability to properly provide educational resources for their children. These families are often required to move to various duty stations as part of their duty and lifestyle, and this legislation will allow our military families to access the same choices that non-military families have available to them with regard to schools and access to appropriate educational resources for their children.” (A “Yes” vote is for the bill.) Sen. Lydia Edwards Yes DUTIES OF THE ADJUTANT GENERAL (S 2675) Senate 38-0, approved and sent to the House a bill that supporters say would clarify the duties of the state’s Adjutant General. The measure provides that the Adjutant General, Massachusetts’ highest-ranking military offi ce, has command of all troops in the state National Guard while carrying out the orders of the governor. The bill also brings state laws about the National Guard chain of command into line with the model used by the vast majority of other states. “The legislation currently before us … seeks to make a technical change to streamline our National Guard’s chain of command structure and bring Massachusetts in line with the vast majority of our sister states,” said Sen. John Velis (D-Westfield). “As currently written, [Massachusetts law] states that the Adjutant General shall not personally excercise command of troops.” Velis continued, “This legislation clarifi es that the Adjutant General, in carrying out the policies and orders of the governor, has command of all Massachusetts National Guard troops — ensuring that the leadership of the Guard is unifi ed and capable of implementing directives with precision. Currently, the Adjutant General lacks the clear statutory authority to personally command our troops during state missions. This gap can cause confusion in command structure and limits the Adjutant General from enforcing the Massachusetts code of military justice.” “It [is] important to make a technical clarification to the command structure of the Massachusetts National Guard that brings us in line with most other states,” said Senate President Karen Spilka (D-Ashland). (A “Yes” vote is for the bill.) Sen. Lydia Edwards Yes GUARD MEMBERS MUST FOLLOW ONLY LAWFUL ORDERS (S 2675) Senate 38-0, approved an amendment that would require that Massachusetts National Guard service members undergo training on their obligation to follow only lawful orders and that they receive guidance on how to respond to orders that violate Americans’ constitutional or statutory rights. “National Guard troops across the country are being asked to violate the sovereignty of other states and the constitutional rights of ordinary Americans by a president who wants to use them like pawns in his game of intimidation,” said amendment sponsor Sen. Mike Moore (D-Millbury). “This amendment is simple. By creating a comprehensive training curriculum for servicemembers, Massachusetts is empowering our National Guard with the knowledge they need to determine, in the event that they are federalized, whether the orders they receive are lawful. The rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution are non-negotiable — the commonwealth of Massachusetts will not let our Guard be illegally used against its own people.” (A “Yes” vote is for the amendment.) Sen. Lydia Edwards Yes ALSO UP ON BEACON HILL GRADUATE STUDENTS AND FAMILY LEAVE AND UNEMPLOYMENT (S 747) — The Financial Services Committee held a hearing on a measure that would strike the exclusion of graduate student workers from the defi nition of “employee” in order to allow for graduate student workers to have access to paid family and medical leave and unemployment insurance. “Graduate students are workers, plain and simple, oftentimes with families, mortgage and the same health, economic and life challenges that most working people face,” said sponsor Sen. Paul Feeney (D-Foxborough). “They put in long hours and perform critical work. Despite the fact that they are working for educational institutions with abundant endowments, many don’t have the same paid family and medical leave and unemployment insurance benefi ts that are aff orded other hard-working people in the commonwealth. This bill would rightfully close that loophole and allow them the same rights as everyone else.” LIFE INSURANCE (S 760) — Another bill heard by the Financial Services Committee would allow the holder of a life insurance policy to update their benefi ciaries using an online tool if one is provided by the life insurance company, as long as the company takes reasonable steps to verify that the identity of the requester matches the holder of the policy. This bill would abolish a current law that requires all benefi ciary changes to be made in person, with a “wet” signature and witness present. “Technology has signifi cantly developed since life insurance benefi ciary practices were set in the commonwealth,” said sponsor Sen. Barry Finegold (DAndover). “Many life insurance companies are now able to accept requests to change designated benefi ciaries under life or endowment insurance policies, and this bill brings our legislation up to speed with the industry. While we move toward more technologically advanced processes, we can maintain safety and identity verifi cation in similarly advanced ways. This bill will help make this process more convenient and time-effi cient for all parties.” DECEASED ANIMALS ON STATE HIGHWAYS (H 3678) — The Transportation Committee held a hearing on a proposal that would require any State Department of Transportation highway employees who
17 Publizr Home