18

Page 18 THE MALDEN ADVOCATE–Friday, February 10, 2023 BUDGET AMENDMENTS (H 2023) Beacon Hill Roll Call By Bob Katzen GET A FREE SUBSCRIPTION TO MASSTERLIST – Join more than 22,000 people, from movers and shakers to political junkies and interested citizens, who start their weekday morning with MASSterList—the popular newsletter that chronicles news and informed analysis about what’s going on up on Beacon Hill, in Massachusetts politics, policy, media and influence. The stories are drawn from major news organizations as well as specialized publications selected by widely acclaimed and highly experienced writers Keith Regan and Matt Murphy who introduce each article in their own clever and inimitable way. MASSterlist will be e-mailed to you FREE every Monday through Friday morning and will give you a leg up on what’s happening in the blood sport of Bay State politics. For more information and to get your free subscription, go to: https://lp. constantcontactpages.com/su/ aPTLucK THE HOUSE AND SENATE: Beacon Hill Roll Call records local representatives' votes on roll calls from the week of January 30-February 3, 2023. There were no roll calls in the Senate last week. HOUSE ADOPTS RULES FOR 2023-2024 SESSION House 153-0, approved a package of rules under which the House will operate during the new 2023-2024 session. A key section would eliminate a COVID-19-era policy that allowed representatives to debate, offer amendments and vote remotely from their Statehouse offices or home. Another change would institute a new hybrid committee hearing structure that will allow for both in-person and remote participation from legislators and the public. Before the pandemic, hearings were conducted only in person while after the pandemic they were held remotely. “We’re gonna keep a segmented remote voting on the committee hearings, which allows greater participation from our constituents and the members,” said House Speaker Ron Mariano (D-Quincy). “But we will not have an in-session remote component any longer.” He noted that it is time to revive the in-person session in which members are in the chamber to debate, vote and have faceto-face contact with their colleagues. A key and controversial amendment proposed by Rep. Erika Uyterhoeven (D-Somerville) was rejected on a voice vote without debate and without a roll call vote. Her amendment would require that committees make public how each legislator on a House committee voted on bills including whether or not to recommend a favorable report, adverse report or send the bill to a study committee. This would replace an existing rule that requires the committee to only post the names of legislators who voted against the bill and list the aggregate vote tally without names of members voting in the affirmative or not voting. “Beacon Hill Roll Call asked Uyterhoeven why she didn’t speak on the floor in favor of her amendment and why she didn’t ask for a roll call vote on it. “I believe [the] amendment … is an improvement that would make the legislative process more accessible and I will continue to fight for changes like this to increase public accessibility and engagement of the legislative process,” Uyterhoeven responded via e-mail. “Unfortunately, today we didn’t have enough support on the proposed changes.” (A “Yes” vote is for the rules package.) Rep. Paul Donato Rep. Steven Ultrino Yes Yes ALLOW ONE HOUR TO READ CONSOLIDATED House 23-130, rejected a Republican proposal that would increase from 30 minutes to one hour the period given to legislators to read any proposed consolidated amendment to the House budget prior to debate and a vote on it. The consolidated amendment system works as follows: Individual representatives file dozens of amendments on the same general subject matters including local aid, social services and public safety. They are then invited to “subject meetings” in Room 348 where they pitch their amendments to Democratic leaders who then draft lengthy, consolidated amendments that include some of the individual representatives’ amendments while excluding others. The House then considers and votes on each consolidated amendment. “This proposed rule change was filed to provide members with more time to read through what are often very lengthy and sometimes complicated amendments,” said sponsor GOP House Minority Leader Rep. Brad Jones (R-North Reading). “Allowing for additional time to review consolidated amendments would help members gain a better understanding of what is actually included in the amendment so they can make a more informed decision when casting their vote.” Opponents of the one-hour rule said the current 30-minute rule has worked well and argued that adding additional time will simply drag out what are already long, often late-at-night budget sessions. They also noted that technology has made it easy for each member to discern whether their individual amendment is included in the consolidated amendment. Rep. Sarah Peake (D-Provincetown) argued against the new rule during debate but did not respond to repeated requests by Beacon Hill Roll Call to comment on her opposition to the proposal. (A “Yes” vote is for allowing one hour. A “No” vote is against allowing it.) Rep. Paul Donato Rep. Steven Ultrino No No ADOPT LOCAL AID RESOLUTIONS BY MARCH 31 (H 2025) House 23-130, rejected a GOP REAL ESTATE TRANSACTIONS BUYER1 KWONG, RICKY MEI, SHERMAN BUYER2 KWONG, WINNIE SELLER1 ZOLOT, HOWARD KWOK, STEPHEN R SELLER2 HO, CHEE K proposal that would require the House and Senate to annually adopt by March 31 resolutions stating the minimum amount of local aid the state will give each city and town for that fiscal year. “Due to the timing of the state budget process, cities and towns must often craft their own municipal budgets without knowing how much local aid they will be receiving,” said sponsor Rep. Brad Jones. “By establishing a minimum baseline for local aid each year before the state budget is finalized, we can give municipal leaders a solid starting point on which to base their budgets.” Opponents of the new rule said the Legislature should inform cities and towns as soon as possible but should not have its hands tied by some arbitrary date. They noted things often change in a matter of days and argued that the Legislature does not know in March what the state’s financial situation will be when a budget is finally approved in May or June. Rep. Bill Straus (D-Mattapoisett) argued against the new rule during debate but did not respond to repeated requests by Beacon Hill Roll Call to comment on his opposition to the proposal. (A “Yes” vote is for the March deadline. A “No” vote is against it.) Rep. Paul Donato Rep. Steven Ultrino No No HOUSE VOTES TO SEAT DEMOCRAT KRISTIN KASSNER IN 2ND ESSEX DISTRICT House 129-22, voted to seat Democrat Kristin Kassner as the state representative from the 2nd Essex District which covers the North Shore towns of Georgetown, Hamilton, Ipswich, Newbury and Rowley, and one precincts in Topsfield. In a contested recount, she beat incumbent Republican Rep. Lenny Mirra by a single vote. The Democratic-led special committee looking at the matter chose not to review any of the ballots Mirra contested, and its two Democrat members argued that Mirra ceded his ability to subject individual votes to scrutiny by waiting until after the Governor's Council certified the recount results to file his lawsuit. “When, as is true in this matter, a candidate is provided the prescribed time and process to object to ballots prior to certification, the House of Representatives is not a proper forum for calling balls and strikes on challenges to the determination of the intent of individual voters,” wrote the panel’s chairman Rep. Michael Day (D-Stoneham) and Rep. Dan Ryan (D-Charlestown), the other Democratic member, in the majority report. “Allowing such redress runs contrary to our system of government and its attendant commitment to timely election results.” “The 2nd Essex District race was decided by the slimmest possible margin of just one vote separating the two candidates following a recount,” said Rep. Brad Jones, the only Republican on the panel. “Given the number of contested ballots and the margin for human error, I thought it was important for the special committee to review the individual ballots in question to determine whether Ms. Kassner or Mr. Mirra had been properly elected to fill the seat, and filed an order to that effect, which was rejected.” “All parties agree that the House is the sole arbiter in this case, and a ruling by the attorney general in 1891 clearly establishes that the House retains the right to examine the ballots in question,” continued Jones. “Given the acknowledgments that mistakes and human error have been identified, a review by the special Committee of all the challenged ballots is not only warranted but is demanded by the oath of office each of the special committee members, including myself, took on January 4, 2023.” (A “Yes” vote is for seating Krassner. A “No” vote is against seating her.) Rep. Paul Donato Rep. Steven Ultrino Yes Yes ALSO UP ON BEACON HILL More freshly filed bills that have been proposed for consideration in the 2023-2024 session include: MARIJUANA AND FIRST RESPONDERS (SD 2230) – Would require the Cannabis Control Commissionand the Executive Office of Public Safety and Security tostudy and report to the Legislature on the barriers that first responders face about their legal right to use cannabis. “As we move away from cannabis prohibition, we should BHRC | SEE PAGE 20 Copyrighted material previously published in Banker & Tradesman/The Commercial Record, a weekly trade newspaper. It is reprinted with permission from the publisher, The Warren Group. For a searchable database of real estate transactions and property information visit: www.thewarrengroup.com. ADDRESS 1 MAUDE ST #11 22-24 CLINTON ST CITY MALDEN MALDEN DATE 01.20.23 01.20.23 PRICE 410000 600000

19 Publizr Home