Page 20 THE EVERETT ADVOCATE – FRiDAy, OCTObER 25, 2024 REAL ESTATE TRANSACTIONS Copyrighted material previously published in Banker & Tradesman/The Commercial Record, a weekly trade newspaper. It is reprinted with permission from the publisher, The Warren Group. For a searchable database of real estate transactions and property information visit: www.thewarrengroup.com. BUYER1 Alla, Romina Febres, Janine BUYER2 SELLER1 Nardone, Raymond Evers, Hunter BEACON | FROM PAGE 18 ballot question and wanted to make sure the voters had both sides of the story available to them before makAging in Place? AmeriGlide offers affordable stair lifts to keep you safe on the stairs. Benefits of an AmeriGlide stair lift: Regain your independence Eliminate the risk of falls on the stairs Access all levels of your home CALL NOW TO SAVE $200 1-844-237-6716 ON ANY STAIR LIFT! SELLER2 Daluz, Alexandra 22 Irving St #8 50 Floyd St #9 ing a decision.” Craney continued, “No group from the affected industries has stepped forward to oppose this ballot question. The way this ballot question ADDRESS CITY DATE Everett Everett 10.10.24 10.10.24 PRICE 350000 610000 is currently written potentially violates state and federal labor law and if passed by the voters, would most likely result in a prolonged legal battle before this potential law is changed.” On its website, the alliance says, Humane Removal Service COMMONWEALTH WILDLIFE CONTROL ANIMAL & BIRD REMOVAL INCLUDING RODENTS CALL 617-285-0023 Your Hometown News Delivered! EVERETT ADVOCATE MALDEN ADVOCATE REVERE ADVOCATE SAUGUS ADVOCATE One year subscription to The Advocate of your choice: $175 per paper in-town per year or $225 per paper out-of-town per year. Name_________________________________________ Address_______________________________________ City_______________ State_______ Zip ____________ CC# _______________________________ Exp. _____ Sec. code____ Advocate (City):___________________ Clip & Mail Coupon with Credit Card, Check or Money Order to: Advocate Newspapers Inc. PO Box 490407, Everett, MA 02149 “The passage of this question will allow state government to set the wages for these private companies, and ultimately force drivers to pay dues into a union they don’t want and that they have little control over. This is possible because this question artificially lowers the threshold required to call a unionization vote from the normal 30 percent of employees to just 2.5 percent. Not only is this unfair to drivers, but this is also a violation of long-established federal labor laws and will likely open the state up to lawsuits and litigation in the future, if passed.” OFFICIAL ARGUMENTS: Here are the official arguments, gathered by the secretary of state, for each side of the question. IN FAVOR: Written by Roxana Rivera, United for Justice, www.DriversNeedUnion.org “A ‘Yes’ vote will give Massachusetts rideshare drivers, who work for companies like Uber and Lyft, the option to join a union while also maintaining driver flexibility and independence. The option to join a union is guaranteed for most workers but rideshare drivers currently don’t have that choice. Vote ‘Yes’ to allow rideshare drivers the option to choose a union.” AGAINST: Written by Massachusetts Fiscal Alliance, www.massfiscal.org “Drivers and riders urge ‘No’ on Question 3 which would raise the prices for all riders, funding union pockets, not drivers’ pockets. This law gives politicians the right to set rules with no accountability and creates a new radical labor category that is inconsistent with federal labor law. Drivers in Massachusetts already receive base [pay] of $32.50 per hour with yearly increases; paid sick leave; paid family medical leave; healthcare stipend; on-the-job injury insurance; anti-discrimination protections; domestic violence leave; anti-retaliation protections; and an appeals process. Question 3 does not really create bargaining for workers. Drivers will have no control over leadership of the union and will pay significant dues without real representation. This proposal is not fair to drivers and allows just 2.5 percent of drivers to force unionization and leaves many drivers without a voice.” - Legal Notice - COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS THE TRIAL COURT PROBATE AND FAMILY COURT Middlesex Probate and Family Court 10-U Commerce Way Woburn, MA 01801 Docket No. MI24D2764DR DIVORCE SUMMONS BY PUBLICATION AND MAILING ARLINDO LOPES vs. MARIA LOPES To the Defendant: The Plaintiff has filed a Complaint for Divorce requesting that the Court grant a divorce for Irretrievable Breakdown of the Marriage 1B. The Complaint is on file at the Court. An Automatic Restraining Order has been entered in this matter preventing you from taking any action which would negatively impact the current financial status of either party. SEE Supplemental Probate Court Rule 411. You are hereby summoned and required to serve upon: Arlindo Lopes, 37 Alfred St., Everett, MA 02149 your answer, if any, on or before 11/21/2024. If you fail to do so, the court will proceed to the hearing and adjudication of this action. You are also required to file a copy of your answer, if any, in the office of the Register of this Court. WITNESS, Hon. Terri L. Klug, First Justice of this Court. Date: October 10, 2024 TARA E. DeCRISTOFARO REGISTER OF PROBATE October 25, 2024
21 Publizr Home